Nike Case

MARK KASKY VERSUS NIKE INC. CASE ISSUES A. RELEVANT FACTS Nike, Inc., were accused, workers who make products are non defend from and non subjected to corporal punishment and/or sexual wickedness; Nike products are not make in accordance with applicable governmental laws and regulations governing wages and hours; Nike products are not made in accordance with applicable laws and regulations governing wellness and refuge conditions; Nike does not pay average line-workers double-the-minimum wage in selenium Asia; workers who produce Nike products do not receive free meals and health care; Nike is not doing a good job and not operating mor every last(predicate)y; and Nike does not guarantee a musical accompaniment wage for all workers who make products, Even though Nike Inc., claimed all these regulations before. The focal point of the lawsuit is Nike communications were commercial speech. Nike did not require to meet standards of truth and honesty enforced in California law. Nike was not entitled to difference that would be attached under the First Amendment. Nike Inc., agreed to pay $1.5 million to patch a lawsuit brought by Marc Kasky accusing it of that false and direct product information. California tyrannical Court accepted the flake and majority created definition of commercial speech and applied it to Nikes messages. Speeches in the commercials have to come from a business, be mean for an audience of consumers and make representations of facts related to products. B. QUESTION: Did the California Supreme Court make the correct decision? Why or why not?

RULES A. RELEVANT LAWS AND REGULATIONS Criminal Charges: Unlawful business practice, negligent mispresentation, unfair labor practices, fraud and deceit and cheapjack advertising. B. AGENCIES Investigations have been conducted by American Federation of Labor- Congress... If you want to make for a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .